Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home donate | Forums | FAQs | Contributions | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright | Contact | Volunteer Positions | Jobs | Bios
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: dark.starz Date: January 31, 2011 07:33:57pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: E-72 Copenhagen 04/17/72 (-1)

http://www.archive.org/details/gd1972-04-17.sbd.sirmick.34224.flac16

Flat performance, too much fun the evening before.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: jerlouvis Date: January 31, 2011 07:51:25pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: E-72 Copenhagen 04/17/72 (-1)

Flat performance?A show with good versions of Bobbie McGee,Next Time You See Me,China Cat with a hot jam in it.Real good takes on Hurts Me Too and Big R.R. Blues and extraordinary performances of Cold Rain,Jack Straw and Saturday Night.All that before a 31 minute Dark Star with some beautiful Jerry/Keith interaction to be followed by an absolutely blistering Caution that just rips for 23 minutes.How anyone could see this show being flat is beyond me.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: dark.starz Date: January 31, 2011 08:34:19pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: E-72 Copenhagen 04/17/72 (-1)

We call em as we ear em.

Flat performance on the grand scale of the E-72 performances.

Too much fun the night before.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Skobud Date: February 01, 2011 04:58:09am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: E-72 Copenhagen 04/17/72 (-1)

"We" lol

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: snori Date: February 01, 2011 06:36:48am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: E-72 Copenhagen 04/17/72 (-1)

The royal "we" (pluralis majestatis), is a nosism employed by a person of high office, such as a monarch, earl or pope.

The patronizing "we" is sometimes used in addressing instead of "you," hinting that the one asked is not alone in his situation, that 'I am with you, we are in this together.'

The psychotic "we" is used chiefly by the mad, exemplified by J.R.R. Tolkien's character Gollum in The Lord of the Rings saga.

Take your pick

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Cliff Hucker Date: February 01, 2011 07:01:57am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: E-72 Copenhagen 04/17/72 (-1)

In this case its clearly the latter.

dark starz is simply Kochman trolling for attention.

And "we" is comprised of his alternate user names yokosduo, music sucks, helenbuckeeta, Jacky Hughes, susaponte, et al

Had dark starz actually taken the time to listen to 4/17/72, he would know that this show is better than the Aarhus performance the night before. But Kochman actually believes that the tour of Europe in 1981 is better than Europe '72...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: snow_and_rain Date: February 01, 2011 07:32:20am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: E-72 Copenhagen 04/17/72 (-1)

I like Europe 71.

http://www.archive.org/details/gd1971-06-21.sbd.miller.94356.flac16

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: johnnyonthespot Date: February 01, 2011 11:18:35am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: E-72 Copenhagen 04/17/72 (-1)

" But Kochman actually believes that the tour of Europe in 1981 is better than Europe '72... "

thats just wrong. I don't care who you are. There's nothing objective about that. You can LIKE 81 better ( dont know WHY you would but to each their own ) but to say it's better is nuts.

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)